• Submit your paper
Author guidelines

Before you start

For queries relating to the status of your paper pre decision, please contact the Editor or Journal Editorial Office. For queries post acceptance, please contact the Supplier Project Manager. These details can be found in the Editorial Team section.

Author responsibilities

Our goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous experience at each stage of the review and publication process. There are also some responsibilities that sit with you as the author. Our expectation is that you will:

  • Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication process.
  • Be accountable for all aspects of your work. This includes investigating and resolving any questions about accuracy or research integrity.
  • Treat communications between you and the journal editor as confidential until an editorial decision has been made.
  • Read about our research ethics for authorship. These state that you must:
    • Include anyone who has made a substantial and meaningful contribution to the submission (anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the acknowledgements).
    • Exclude anyone who hasn’t contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be associated with the research.
    • In accordance with COPE’s position statement on AI tools, Large Language Models cannot be credited with authorship as they are incapable of conceptualising a research design without human direction and cannot be accountable for the integrity, originality, and validity of the published work.
  • If your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find out more about informed consent.

Research and publishing ethics

Our editors and employees work hard to ensure the content we publish is ethically sound. To help us achieve that goal, we closely follow the advice laid out in the guidelines and flowcharts on the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) website.

We have also developed our research and publishing ethics guidelines. If you haven’t already read these, we urge you to do so – they will help you avoid the most common publishing ethics issues.

A few key points:

  • Any manuscript you submit to this journal should be original. That means it should not have been published before in its current, or similar, form. Exceptions to this rule are outlined in our pre-print and conference paper policies.  If any substantial element of your paper has been previously published, you need to declare this to the journal editor upon submission. Please note, the journal editor may use Crossref Similarity Check to check on the originality of submissions received. This service compares submissions against a database of 49 million works from 800 scholarly publishers.
  • Your work should not have been submitted elsewhere and should not be under consideration by any other publication.
  • If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it upon submission; this allows the editor to decide how they would like to proceed. Read about conflict of interest in our research and publishing ethics guidelines.
  • By submitting your work to Emerald, you are guaranteeing that the work is not in infringement of any existing copyright.

Third party copyright permissions

Prior to article submission, you need to ensure you’ve applied for, and received, written permission to use any material in your manuscript that has been created by a third party. Please note, we are unable to publish any article that still has permissions pending. The rights we require are:

  • Non-exclusive rights to reproduce the material in the article or book chapter.
  • Print and electronic rights.
  • Worldwide English-language rights.
  • To use the material for the life of the work. That means there should be no time restrictions on its re-use e.g. a one-year licence.

We are a member of the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) and participate in the STM permissions guidelines, a reciprocal free exchange of material with other STM publishers.  In some cases, this may mean that you don’t need permission to re-use content. If so, please highlight this at the submission stage.

Please take a few moments to read our guide to publishing permissions to ensure you have met all the requirements, so that we can process your submission without delay.

Open access submissions and information

All our journals currently offer two open access (OA) publishing paths; gold open access and green open access.

If you would like to, or are required to, make the branded publisher PDF (also known as the version of record) freely available immediately upon publication, you can select the gold open access route once your paper is accepted. 

If you’ve chosen to publish gold open access, this is the point you will be asked to pay the APC (article processing charge). This varies per journal and can be found on our APC price list or on the editorial system at the point of submission. Your article will be published with a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence, which outlines how readers can reuse your work.

Alternatively, if you would like to, or are required to, publish open access but your funding doesn’t cover the cost of the APC, you can choose the green open access, or self-archiving, route. As soon as your article is published, you can make the author accepted manuscript (the version accepted for publication) openly available, free from payment and embargo periods.

You can find out more about our open access routes, our APCs and waivers and read our FAQs on our open research page. 

Find out about open

Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines

We are a signatory of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines, a framework that supports the reproducibility of research through the adoption of transparent research practices. That means we encourage you to:

  • Cite and fully reference all data, program code, and other methods in your article.
  • Include persistent identifiers, such as a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), in references for datasets and program codes. Persistent identifiers ensure future access to unique published digital objects, such as a piece of text or datasets. Persistent identifiers are assigned to datasets by digital archives, such as institutional repositories and partners in the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences (Data-PASS).
  • Follow appropriate international and national procedures with respect to data protection, rights to privacy and other ethical considerations, whenever you cite data. For further guidance please refer to our research and publishing ethics guidelines. For an example on how to cite datasets, please refer to the references section below.

Prepare your submission

Manuscript support services

We are pleased to partner with Editage, a platform that connects you with relevant experts in language support, translation, editing, visuals, consulting, and more. After you’ve agreed a fee, they will work with you to enhance your manuscript and get it submission-ready.

This is an optional service for authors who feel they need a little extra support. It does not guarantee your work will be accepted for review or publication.

Visit Editage

Manuscript requirements

Before you submit your manuscript, it’s important you read and follow the guidelines below. You will also find some useful tips in our structure your journal submission how-to guide.


Article files should be provided in Microsoft Word format.

While you are welcome to submit a PDF of the document alongside the Word file, PDFs alone are not acceptable. LaTeX files can also be used but only if an accompanying PDF document is provided. Acceptable figure file types are listed further below.

Article length / word count

Articles should be between 5000  and 7500 words in length. This includes all text, for example, the structured abstract, references, all text in tables, and figures and appendices. 

Please allow 280 words for each figure or table.

Article title

A concisely worded title should be provided.

Author details

The names of all contributing authors should be added to the ScholarOne submission; please list them in the order in which you’d like them to be published. Each contributing author will need their own ScholarOne author account, from which we will extract the following details:

  • Author email address (institutional preferred).
  • Author name. We will reproduce it exactly, so any middle names and/or initials they want featured must be included.
  • Author affiliation. This should be where they were based when the research for the paper was conducted.

In multi-authored papers, it’s important that ALL authors that have made a significant contribution to the paper are listed. Those who have provided support but have not contributed to the research should be featured in an acknowledgements section. You should never include people who have not contributed to the paper or who don’t want to be associated with the research. Read about our research ethics for authorship.

Biographies and acknowledgements

If you want to include these items, save them in a separate Microsoft Word document and upload the file with your submission. Where they are included, a brief professional biography of not more than 100 words should be supplied for each named author.

Research funding

Your article must reference all sources of external research funding in the acknowledgements section. You should describe the role of the funder or financial sponsor in the entire research process, from study design to submission.

Structured abstract

All submissions must include a structured abstract, following the format outlined below.

These four sub-headings and their accompanying explanations must always be included:

  • Purpose
  • Design/methodology/approach
  • Findings
  • Originality

The following three sub-headings are optional and can be included, if applicable:

  • Research limitations/implications
  • Practical implications
  • Social implications

You can find some useful tips in our write an article abstract how-to guide.

The maximum length of your abstract should be 250 words in total, including keywords and article classification (see the sections below).


Your submission should include up to 12 appropriate and short keywords that capture the principal topics of the paper. Our Creating an SEO-friendly manuscript how to guide contains some practical guidance on choosing search-engine friendly keywords.

Please note, while we will always try to use the keywords you’ve suggested, the in-house editorial team may replace some of them with matching terms to ensure consistency across publications and improve your article’s visibility.

Article classification

During the submission process, you will be asked to select a type for your paper; the options are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:

  • Research Paper
  • Conceptual Paper

You will also be asked to select a category for your paper. The options for this are listed below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:

Research paper. Reports on any type of research undertaken by the author(s), including:

  • The construction or testing of a model or framework
  • Action research
  • Testing of data, market research or surveys
  • Empirical, scientific or clinical research
  • Papers with a practical focus

Viewpoint. Covers any paper where content is dependent on the author's opinion and interpretation. This includes journalistic and magazine-style pieces.

Technical paper. Describes and evaluates technical products, processes or services.

Conceptual paper. Focuses on developing hypotheses and is usually discursive. Covers philosophical discussions and comparative studies of other authors’ work and thinking.

Case study. Describes actual interventions or experiences within organizations. It can be subjective and doesn’t generally report on research. Also covers a description of a legal case or a hypothetical case study used as a teaching exercise.

Literature review. This category should only be used if the main purpose of the paper is to annotate and/or critique the literature in a particular field. It could be a selective bibliography providing advice on information sources, or the paper may aim to cover the main contributors to the development of a topic and explore their different views.

General review. Provides an overview or historical examination of some concept, technique or phenomenon. Papers are likely to be more descriptive or instructional (‘how to’ papers) than discursive.


Headings must be concise, with a clear indication of the required hierarchy. 

The preferred format is for first level headings to be in bold, and subsequent sub-headings to be in medium italics.


Notes or endnotes should only be used if absolutely necessary. They should be identified in the text by consecutive numbers enclosed in square brackets. These numbers should then be listed, and explained, at the end of the article.


All figures (charts, diagrams, line drawings, webpages/screenshots, and photographic images) should be submitted electronically. Both colour and black and white files are accepted.

There are a few other important points to note:

  • All figures should be supplied at the highest resolution/quality possible with numbers and text clearly legible.
  • Acceptable formats are .ai, .eps, .jpeg, .bmp, and .tif.
  • Electronic figures created in other applications should be supplied in their original formats and should also be either copied and pasted into a blank MS Word document, or submitted as a PDF file.
  • All figures should be numbered consecutively with Arabic numerals and have clear captions.
  • All photographs should be numbered as Plate 1, 2, 3, etc. and have clear captions.
  • All figure/table captions should include the necessary credit line, acknowledgement, or attribution if you have been given permission to use the figure/table; if the figure/table is the property of the author(s), this should be acknowledged in the caption.


Tables should be typed and submitted in a separate file to the main body of the article. The position of each table should be clearly labelled in the main body of the article with corresponding labels clearly shown in the table file. Tables should be numbered consecutively in Roman numerals (e.g. I, II, etc.).

Give each table a brief title. Ensure that any superscripts or asterisks are shown next to the relevant items and have explanations displayed as footnotes to the table, figure or plate.

Supplementary files

Where tables, figures, appendices, and other additional content are supplementary to the article but not critical to the reader’s understanding of it, you can choose to host these supplementary files alongside your article on Insight, Emerald’s content hosting platform, or on an institutional or personal repository. All supplementary material must be submitted prior to acceptance.

If you choose to host your supplementary files on Insight, you must submit these as separate files alongside your article. Files should be clearly labelled in such a way that makes it clear they are supplementary; Emerald recommends that the file name is descriptive and that it follows the format ‘Supplementary_material_appendix_1’ or ‘Supplementary tables’. All supplementary material must be mentioned at the appropriate moment in the main text of the article, there is no need to include the content of the file but only the file name. A link to the supplementary material will be added to the article during production, and the material will be made available alongside the main text of the article at the point of EarlyCite publication.

Please note that Emerald will not make any changes to the material; it will not be copyedited, typeset, and authors will not receive proofs. Emerald therefore strongly recommends that you style all supplementary material ahead of acceptance of the article.

Emerald Insight can host the following file types and extensions:

  • Adobe Acrobat (.pdf)
  • MS Word document (.doc, .docx)
  • MS Excel (.xls, xlsx)
  • MS PowerPoint (.pptx)
  • Image (.png, .jpeg, .gif)
  • Plain ASCII text (.txt)
  • PostScript (.ps)
  • Rich Text Format (.rtf)

If you choose to use an institutional or personal repository, you should ensure that the supplementary material is hosted on the repository ahead of submission, and then include a link only to the repository within the article. It is the responsibility of the submitting author to ensure that the material is free to access and that it remains permanently available.

Please note that extensive supplementary material may be subject to peer review; this is at the discretion of the journal Editor and dependent on the content of the material (for example, whether including it would support the reviewer making a decision on the article during the peer review process).


All references in your manuscript must be formatted using one of the recognised Harvard styles. You are welcome to use the Harvard style Emerald has adopted – we’ve provided a detailed guide below. Want to use a different Harvard style? That’s fine, our typesetters will make any necessary changes to your manuscript if it is accepted. Please ensure you check all your citations for completeness, accuracy and consistency.

Emerald’s Harvard referencing style

References to other publications in your text should be written as follows:

  • Single author: (Adams, 2006)
  • Two authors: (Adams and Brown, 2006)
  • Three or more authors: (Adams et al., 2006) Please note, ‘et al' should always be written in italics.

A few other style points. These apply to both the main body of text and your final list of references.

  • When referring to pages in a publication, use ‘p.(page number)’ for a single page or ‘pp.(page numbers)’ to indicate a page range.
  • Page numbers should always be written out in full, e.g. 175-179, not 175-9.
  • Where a colon or dash appears in the title of an article or book chapter, the letter that follows that colon or dash should always be lower case.
  • When citing a work with multiple editors, use the abbreviation ‘Ed.s’.

At the end of your paper, please supply a reference list in alphabetical order using the style guidelines below. Where a DOI is available, this should be included at the end of the reference.

For books

Surname, initials (year), title of book, publisher, place of publication.

e.g. Harrow, R. (2005), No Place to Hide, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.

For book chapters

Surname, initials (year), "chapter title", editor's surname, initials (Ed.), title of book, publisher, place of publication, page numbers.

e.g. Calabrese, F.A. (2005), "The early pathways: theory to practice – a continuum", Stankosky, M. (Ed.), Creating the Discipline of Knowledge Management, Elsevier, New York, NY, pp.15-20.

For journals

Surname, initials (year), "title of article", journal name, volume issue, page numbers.

e.g. Capizzi, M.T. and Ferguson, R. (2005), "Loyalty trends for the twenty-first century", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp.72-80.

For published 
conference proceedings

Surname, initials (year of publication), "title of paper", in editor’s surname, initials (Ed.), title of published proceeding which may include place and date(s) held, publisher, place of publication, page numbers.

e.g. Wilde, S. and Cox, C. (2008), “Principal factors contributing to the competitiveness of tourism destinations at varying stages of development”, in Richardson, S., Fredline, L., Patiar A., & Ternel, M. (Ed.s), CAUTHE 2008: Where the 'bloody hell' are we?, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, pp.115-118.

For unpublished 
conference proceedings

Surname, initials (year), "title of paper", paper presented at [name of conference], [date of conference], [place of conference], available at: URL if freely available on the internet (accessed date).

e.g. Aumueller, D. (2005), "Semantic authoring and retrieval within a wiki", paper presented at the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 29 May-1 June, Heraklion, Crete, available at: http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/file/aumueller05wiksar.pdf (accessed 20 February 2007).

For working papers

Surname, initials (year), "title of article", working paper [number if available], institution or organization, place of organization, date.

e.g. Moizer, P. (2003), "How published academic research can inform policy decisions: the case of mandatory rotation of audit appointments", working paper, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, 28 March.

For encyclopaedia entries 
(with no author or editor)

Title of encyclopaedia (year), "title of entry", volume, edition, title of encyclopaedia, publisher, place of publication, page numbers.

e.g. Encyclopaedia Britannica (1926), "Psychology of culture contact", Vol. 1, 13th ed., Encyclopaedia Britannica, London and New York, NY, pp.765-771.

(for authored entries, please refer to book chapter guidelines above)

For newspaper 
articles (authored)

Surname, initials (year), "article title", newspaper, date, page numbers.

e.g. Smith, A. (2008), "Money for old rope", Daily News, 21 January, pp.1, 3-4.

For newspaper 
articles (non-authored)

Newspaper (year), "article title", date, page numbers.

e.g. Daily News (2008), "Small change", 2 February, p.7.

For archival or other unpublished sources

Surname, initials (year), "title of document", unpublished manuscript, collection name, inventory record, name of archive, location of archive.

e.g. Litman, S. (1902), "Mechanism & Technique of Commerce", unpublished manuscript, Simon Litman Papers, Record series 9/5/29 Box 3, University of Illinois Archives, Urbana-Champaign, IL.

For electronic sources

If available online, the full URL should be supplied at the end of the reference, as well as the date that the resource was accessed.

Surname, initials (year), “title of electronic source”, available at: persistent URL (accessed date month year).

e.g. Weida, S. and Stolley, K. (2013), “Developing strong thesis statements”, available at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/1/ (accessed 20 June 2018)

Standalone URLs, i.e. those without an author or date, should be included either inside parentheses within the main text, or preferably set as a note (Roman numeral within square brackets within text followed by the full URL address at the end of the paper).

For data

Surname, initials (year), title of dataset, name of data repository, available at: persistent URL, (accessed date month year).

e.g. Campbell, A. and Kahn, R.L. (2015), American National Election Study, 1948, ICPSR07218-v4, Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (distributor), Ann Arbor, MI, available at: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07218.v4 (accessed 20 June 2018)

Submit your manuscript

There are a number of key steps you should follow to ensure a smooth and trouble-free submission.

Double check your manuscript

Before submitting your work, it is your responsibility to check that the manuscript is complete, grammatically correct, and without spelling or typographical errors. A few other important points:

  • Give the journal aims and scope a final read. Is your manuscript definitely a good fit? If it isn’t, the editor may decline it without peer review.
  • Does your manuscript comply with our research and publishing ethics guidelines?
  • Have you cleared any necessary publishing permissions?
  • Have you followed all the formatting requirements laid out in these author guidelines?
  • Does the manuscript contain any information that might help the reviewer identify you? This could compromise the anonymous peer review process. A few tips:
    • If you need to refer to your own work, use wording such as ‘previous research has demonstrated’ not ‘our previous research has demonstrated’.
    • If you need to refer to your own, currently unpublished work, don’t include this work in the reference list.
    • Any acknowledgments or author biographies should be uploaded as separate files.
    • Carry out a final check to ensure that no author names appear anywhere in the manuscript. This includes in figures or captions.

You will find a helpful submission checklist on the website Think.Check.Submit.

The submission process

All manuscripts should be submitted through our editorial system by the corresponding author.

A separate author account is required for each journal you submit to. If this is your first time submitting to this journal, please choose the Create an account or Register now option in the editorial system. If you already have an Emerald login, you are welcome to reuse the existing username and password here.

Please note, the next time you log into the system, you will be asked for your username. This will be the email address you entered when you set up your account.

Don't forget to add your ORCiD ID during the submission process. It will be embedded in your published article, along with a link to the ORCiD registry allowing others to easily match you with your work.

Don’t have one yet? It only takes a few moments to register for a free ORCiD identifier.

Visit the ScholarOne support centre for further help and guidance.

What you can expect next

You will receive an automated email from the journal editor, confirming your successful submission. It will provide you with a manuscript number, which will be used in all future correspondence about your submission. If you have any reason to suspect the confirmation email you receive might be fraudulent, please contact our Rights team on [email protected]

Post submission

Review and decision process

Each submission is checked by the editor. At this stage, they may choose to decline or unsubmit your manuscript if it doesn’t fit the journal aims and scope, or they feel the language/manuscript quality is too low.

If they think it might be suitable for the publication, they will send it to at least two independent referees for double anonymous peer review.  Once these reviewers have provided their feedback, the editor may decide to accept your manuscript, request minor or major revisions, or decline your work.

While all journals work to different timescales, the goal is that the editor will inform you of their first decision within 60 days.

During this period, we will send you automated updates on the progress of your manuscript via our submission system, or you can log in to check on the current status of your paper.  Each time we contact you, we will quote the manuscript number you were given at the point of submission. If you receive an email that does not match these criteria, it could be fraudulent and we recommend you email [email protected]

If your submission is accepted

Open access

Once your paper is accepted, you will have the opportunity to indicate whether you would like to publish your paper via the gold open access route.

If you’ve chosen to publish gold open access, this is the point you will be asked to pay the APC (article processing charge).  This varies per journal and can be found on our APC price list or on the editorial system at the point of submission. Your article will be published with a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence, which outlines how readers can reuse your work.

For UK journal article authors - if you wish to submit your work accepted by Emerald to REF 2021, you must make a ‘closed deposit’ of your accepted manuscript to your respective institutional repository upon acceptance of your article. Articles accepted for publication after 1st April 2018 should be deposited as soon as possible, but no later than three months after the acceptance date. For further information and guidance, please refer to the REF 2021 website.


All accepted authors are sent an email with a link to a licence form.  This should be checked for accuracy, for example whether contact and affiliation details are up to date and your name is spelled correctly, and then returned to us electronically. If there is a reason why you can’t assign copyright to us, you should discuss this with your journal content editor. You will find their contact details on the editorial team section above.

Proofing and typesetting

Once we have received your completed licence form, the article will pass directly into the production process. We will carry out editorial checks, copyediting, and typesetting and then return proofs to you (if you are the corresponding author) for your review. This is your opportunity to correct any typographical errors, grammatical errors or incorrect author details. We can’t accept requests to rewrite texts at this stage.

When the page proofs are finalised, the fully typeset and proofed version of record is published online. This is referred to as the EarlyCite version. While an EarlyCite article has yet to be assigned to a volume or issue, it does have a digital object identifier (DOI) and is fully citable. It will be compiled into an issue according to the journal’s issue schedule, with papers being added by chronological date of publication.

How to share your paper

Visit our author rights page to find out how you can reuse and share your work.

To find tips on increasing the visibility of your published paper, read about how to promote your work.

Correcting inaccuracies in your published paper

Sometimes errors are made during the research, writing and publishing processes. When these issues arise, we have the option of withdrawing the paper or introducing a correction notice. Find out more about our article withdrawal and correction policies.

Need to make a change to the author list? See our frequently asked questions (FAQs) below.

Frequently asked questions

Is there a submission fee
for the journal?

The only time we will ever ask you for money to publish in an Emerald journal is if you have chosen to publish via the gold open access route. You will be asked to pay an APC (article processing charge) once your paper has been accepted (unless it is a sponsored open access journal). 

Read about our APCs

At no other time will you be asked to contribute financially towards your article’s publication. If you haven’t chosen gold open access and you receive an email which appears to be from Emerald, asking you for payment to publish, please contact our Rights team on [email protected]

How can I become
a reviewer for a journal?

Please contact the editor for the journal, with a copy of your CV. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page.

Who do I contact if I want to find out which volume and issue my accepted paper will appear in?

Typically, papers are added to an issue according to their date of publication. If you would like to know in advance which issue your paper will appear in, please contact the content editor of the journal. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. Once your paper has been published in an issue, you will be notified by email.

Who do I contact if I have
a query about my submission?

Please email the journal editor – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. If you ever suspect an email you’ve received from Emerald might not be genuine, you are welcome to verify it with the content editor for the journal, whose contact details can be found on the editorial team tab on this page. Alternatively, you can email our Rights team.

Is my paper suitable
for the journal?

If you’ve read the aims and scope on the journal landing page and are still unsure whether your paper is suitable for the journal, please email the editor and include your paper's title and structured abstract. They will be able to advise on your manuscript’s suitability. You will find their contact details on the Editorial team tab on this page.

How do I make a change to the list of authors once the manuscript has been submitted?

Authorship and the order in which the authors are listed on the paper should be agreed prior to submission. We have a right first time policy on this and no changes can be made to the list once submitted. If you have made an error in the submission process, please email the Journal Editorial Office who will look into your request – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page.

Editorial team
  • Editor-in-Chief

  • Former Editor

    • Yochanan Altman
      BEM, Bordeaux Business School - UK
    • Zinta Byrne
      Colorado State University - USA
    • Andrew Kakabadse
      University of Reading - UK
    • Dianna Stone
      University of New Mexico - USA
    • Amanuel Tekleab
      Mike Ilitch School of Business, Wayne State University, USA - USA
    • Lois Tetrick
      George Mason University - USA
    • James Werbel
      Iowa State University - USA
  • Editorial Assistant

  • Senior Associate Editor

    • Adam Vanhove
      James Madison University - USA
  • Associate Editors

    • Miriam Arnold
      Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research - Germany
    • Anja Baethge
      MSH Medical School - Germany
    • Marcus Crede (Methodology)
      Iowa State University - USA
    • Pablo Escribano
      Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez - Chile
    • Vickie Gallagher
      Cleveland State University, USA
    • Bella Galperin
      University of Tampa - USA
    • Jorge Gonzalez
      University of Texas – Rio Grande Valley - USA
    • Felipe Guzman
      IESEG School of Management - France
    • Maria Hamdani
      University of Akron - USA
    • Peter Harms
      University of Alabama - USA
    • Yariv Itzkovich
      Kinneret Academic College - Israel
    • Ulrich Leicht-Deobald
      Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin - Ireland
    • Lin Lu
      Shanghai Jiao Tong University - People's Republic of China
    • Bei Lyu
      Huaibei Normal University - China & Panyapiwat Institute of Management - Thailand
    • Jeremy D. Meuser
      University of Mississippi - USA
    • Guy Notelaers
      University of Bergen - Norway
    • Jian Peng
      Guangzhou University - People's Republic of China
    • Leticia Ramos-Garza
      Tecnologico de Monterrey - Mexico
    • Patrick Rosopa (Methodology)
      Clemson University - USA
    • Benjamin Walsh
      Grand Valley State University - USA
    • Frankie Weinberg
      Loyola University - New Orleans - USA
    • Christian Yao
      Victoria University of Wellington - New Zealand
    • Xin-an Zhang
      Shanghai Jiao Tong University - People's Republic of China
    • Qin Zhou
      Leeds University Business School - UK
  • Publisher

  • Journal Editorial Office (For queries related to pre-acceptance)

  • Supplier Project Manager (For queries related to post-acceptance)

  • Editorial Advisory Board

    • Neil Anderson
      Brunel Business School - UK
    • Neal Ashkanasy
      The University of Queensland - Australia
    • Yehuda Baruch
      University of Southampton - UK
    • Zinta Byrne
      Colorado State University - USA
    • Cary L. Cooper
      Manchester Business School - UK
    • Helena Cooper-Thomas
      Auckland University of Technology - New Zealand
    • Rolf van Dick
      Goethe University - Germany
    • Dov Eden PhD
      Tel Aviv University - Israel
    • Martin Euwema
      Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - Belgium
    • Adrian Furnham
      University College London - UK
    • Hugh P Gunz
      Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto - Canada
    • Nathan Hartman
      Illinois State University - USA
    • I M Jawahar
      Illinois State University - USA
    • Andrew Kakabadse
      University of Reading - UK
    • Manuel London
      State University of New York at Stony Brook - USA
    • Wolfgang Mayrhofer
      WU Vienna - Austria
    • Francisco Gil Rodriguez
      Universidad Complutense de Madrid - Spain
    • Wilmar B Schaufeli PhD
      Research Institute for Psychology & Health, Utrecht University - The Netherlands
    • Dianna Stone
      University of New Mexico - USA
    • Amanuel Tekleab
      Mike Ilitch School of Business, Wayne State University, USA - USA
    • Chay Yue Wah
      SIM University - Singapore
  • Editorial Review Board

    • Amer Al-Atw
      Al Muthanna University - Iraq
    • Seyyed Babak Alavi
      Sharif University of Technology - Iran
    • Miriam Arnold
      Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research - Germany
    • Guclu Atinc
      Texas A&M University - USA
    • Wee Chan Au
      Newcastle University - UK
    • Alexandre Bachkirov
      Sultan Qaboos University - Oman
    • David Baldridge
      Oregon State University - USA
    • Mariana Bargsted
      Universidad Adolfo Ibanez - Chile
    • Janet L. Barnes-Farrell
      University of Connecticut - USA
    • Gayle Baugh
      University of West Florida - USA
    • Nicholas Beutell
      Iona College - USA
    • Donna Blancero
      National Society of Hispanic MBAs - USA
    • Orna Blumen
      University of Haifa - Israel
    • William H. Bommer
      California State University at Fresno - USA
    • Johannes Brunzel
      Philipps-Universität Marburg - Germany
    • Christopher Burt
      University of Canterbury - New Zealand
    • Christopher Castille
      Nicholls State University - USA
    • Jean-Luc Cerdin
      ESSEC Business School - France
    • Man-Ling Chang
      National Chung Hsing University - Taiwan
    • Peerayuth Charoensukmongkol
      National Institute of Development Administration - Thailand
    • Eva Cifre
      Universitat Jaume I - Spain
    • Adrienne Collela
      Tulane University - USA
    • Richard Coughlan
      University of Richmond - USA
    • Deborah Danzis
      High Point University - USA
    • Marianna Delegach
      Sapir College - Israel
    • Rolf van Dick
      Goethe University - Germany
    • Dorothy Doolittle
      Christopher Newport University - USA
    • Dianne Gardner
      Massey University - New Zealand
    • Konstantina Georgiou
      Athens University of Economics and Business - Greece
    • Jorge Gonzalez
      University of Texas – Rio Grande Valley - USA
    • Jarrod Haar
      Massey University - New Zealand
    • Alex Haslam
      University of Queensland - Australia
    • Severin Hornung
      Carnegie Mellon University - USA
    • Tun-Chun Huang
      National Changhua University of Education - Taiwan
    • Hendrik Huettermann
      Bundeswehr University Munich - Germany
    • Yariv Itzkovich
      Kinneret Academic College - Israel
    • Kim Kawon
      Seoul National University - Korea
    • Melissa Keith
      Purdue University College of Health and Human Sciences - USA
    • Sewon Kim
      State University of New York (SUNY) Empire State College - USA
    • Youngsang Kim
      Sungkyunkwan University - Korea
    • Venkat R. Krishnan
      Great Lakes Institute of Management - India
    • Gary Latham
      University of Toronto - Canada
    • Matthew Leon
      University of North Florida - USA
    • Katrina Jia Lin
      The Hong Kong Polytechnic University - Hong Kong
    • Yonghong Liu
      University of North Carolina at Greensboro - USA
    • Barbara Lond
      The BLC Group - UK
    • Chang-qin Lu
      Peking University - People's Republic of China
    • Kimberly Lukaszewski
      State University of New York - USA
    • Brian Lyons
      Elon University - USA
    • Jennifer Marrone
      Seattle University - USA
    • Roger Mayer
      Poole College of Management, North Carolina State University - USA
    • Alma Marie McCarthy
      National University of Ireland Galway - Ireland
    • Brian Miller
      Texas State University - USA
    • Sara Murphy
      The University of Winnipeg - Canada
    • Ioannis Nikolaou
      Athens University of Economics and Business - Greece
    • Miguel Olivas-Lujan
      Clarion University of Pennsylvania, USA and Tecnologico de Monterrey - Mexico
    • Laura Parks-Leduc
      James Madison University - USA
    • Birgit Pauksztat
      Uppsala University - Sweden
    • Jian Peng
      Guangzhou University - People's Republic of China
    • Charles A. Pierce
      The University of Memphis - USA
    • Matthew M Piszczek
      Wayne State University - USA
    • Sapna Popli
      Institute of Management Technology - India
    • Narda Quigley
      Villanova University - USA
    • Allanah Rafferty
      Griffith University - Australia
    • Leticia Ramos-Garza
      Tecnologico de Monterrey - Mexico
    • Lucia Ratiu
      Babes-Bolyai University - Romania
    • Cort W. Rudolph
      Saint Louis University - USA
    • Fabrizio Scrima
      Université Paris-Ouest Nanterre La Défense - France
    • Marcia Simmering
      Louisiana Tech University - USA
    • Jarvis Smallfield
      University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - USA
    • Mark Somers
      New Jersey Institute of Technology - USA
    • Zhigang Song
      Shanghai Jiao Tong University - China
    • Eugene F. Stone-Romero
      University of Texas at San Antonio - USA
    • Sherry Sullivan
      Bowling Green State University - USA
    • Jian-Min Sun
      Renmin University of China - People's Republic of China
    • Stephanie Thomason
      The University of Tampa - USA
    • Paul Thurston
      Siena College - USA
    • David Turnipseed
      University of South Alabama - USA
    • Mireia Valverde
      Universitat Rovira i Virgili - Spain
    • Christian Vandenberghe
      HEC Montréal - Canada
    • Laura Venz
      Leuphana University of Lüneburg - Germany
    • Yu-Chen Wei
      National Taipei University of Education - Taiwan
    • Sarah Wright
      University of Canterbury - New Zealand
    • Gary Yukl
      School of Business, Albany State University of New York - USA
    • Claudia de Andrade
      School of Education of Coimbra - ESEC - Portugal
    • Melanie de Ruiter
      Nyenrode Business Universiteit - The Netherlands
Indexing & metrics
Scopus Logo


CiteScore 2022

Scopus Logo


CiteScore Tracker 2023

(updated monthly)

Clarivate analytics logo

2021 Impact Factor

Clarivate analytics logo

5-year Impact Factor (2021)

This journal is abstracted and indexed by

  • Business Source Alumni Edition/Complete/Government Edition/Corporate/Corporate Plus/Elite/Premier
  • Cabell's Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Management & Marketing Abstracts
  • ClinPSYC
  • Corporate Resource Net
  • Current Contents/ Social Sciences Edition
  • e-psyche
  • Emerald Management Reviews
  • ESSEC Business School
  • Genamics
  • Health Business Elite
  • Human Resource Abstracts
  • Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition
  • Management and Marketing Abstracts
  • PsychINFO
  • Psychological Abstracts
  • ReadCube Discovery
  • Social Planning / Policy & Development Abstracts
  • Training & Development Alert
  • Social Scisearch
  • TOC Premier (EBSCO)

This journal is ranked by

  • Chartered Association of Business Schools (CABS, UK) Academic Journal Quality Guide
  • AERES (France)
  • AIDEA (Italy)
  • Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Quality Journal List
  • Australian Research Council (ERA Journal List)
  • BFI (Denmark)
  • CNRS (France)
  • ESSEC (France)
  • JourQUAL 2.1 (Germany)
  • NSD (Norway)
  • Scopus
  • Social Science Citation Index SSCI (Clarivate Analytics)
  • The Publication Forum (Finland)
  • VHB-JOURQUAL 3 (Germany)
Calls for papers & news

Calls for papers

01 Nov 2023

Psychological contract: Issues and emerging developments

Journal of Managerial Psychology

Introduction  Psychological contract is a core building block that forms the basis of relationships within organizations. Today, employees are increasingly working in multicultural teams, often situated in multiple countries, wher...

Guest editor(s):
Smirti Kutaula, Alvina Gillani, Pawan S. Budhwar, Pawan S. Budhwar
Psychological contract: Issues and emerging developments


Literati awards

The Journal of Managerial Psychology (JMP) has a unique focus on the psychological and social understanding and impact of management in organizations.

ISSN: 0268-3946
eISSN: 0268-3946

Aims and scope

The journal concerns itself with application of theory and practice of managerial psychology, which as a field focuses on the behaviours, theories, practice, methods, and tools used to solve workplace problems and increase the efficacy of people at work. Managerial psychology is a field that applies psychological principles and theory to executive and managerial roles, to support, improve, and advance the effectiveness of those in the roles towards achieving a healthy, meaningful, and productive organization.

JMP strongly encourages empirical articles based on theory and a solid literature foundation that are interesting, novel, impactful, and well executed. The journal has no methodological preference; papers that fall along the qualitative to quantitative to mixed-method approach are welcome and will be given full consideration. Book reviews are not appropriate for the journal. Consideration will be given for full literature reviews that support and justify a series of propositions and advancement of theory in managerial psychology. Thus, conceptual papers grounded in a solid literature foundation, which provides for theoretical development and advancement in the field, are welcome. Case studies that describe actual interventions or experiences within organizations that are grounded in rigorous scientific methods, such as quasi-experimentation, and that can advance the field are welcome.

Why read the Journal of Managerial Psychology?

JMP positions itself at the leading edge of developments in psychological knowledge as applied to managing and organizing people and work. JMP encourages novel discourse and the application of theory and best practices in research and science, aiming to provide a bridge from science to practice, and from practice to science.

Why publish in the Journal of Managerial Psychology?

JMP is dedicated to publishing rigorous and unique contributions to understanding the psychological underpinnings and mechanisms of managing in organizations. We aim to find contributions that matter – that make a difference in our science and practice, and that are based on credible scientific methods. Our goal is to make an impact on the field of managerial psychology by publishing good science that can inform practice and good practice that can inform science.

Editorial criteria

All papers accepted into the journal’s peer review process will be assessed against the following criteria:

  • Importance of the study and contribution to the field
  • Value and rationale of the study
  • Description of the background theory and research
  • Relevant connection to previous theory and research
  • Methodology that is rigorous, appropriate for the study, and clearly explained
  • Results that are clearly and accurately presented, as well as appropriate for the study
  • Conclusions that accurately and adequately interpret the results and place them in light of the introduction
  • Complete references format that follows the American Psychological Association most recent Style Guide
  • Logical structure and formatting that follows the American Psychological Association most recent Style Guide
  • Overall clarity of expression and writing (JMP is an English journal)

This journal is aligned with our responsible management goal

We aim to champion researchers, practitioners, policymakers and organisations who share our goals of contributing to a more ethical, responsible and sustainable way of working.

SDG 8 Decent work & economic growth
SDG 9 Industry, innovation & infrastructure
SDG 10 Reduced inequalities
SDG 11 Sustainable cities & communities
SDG 12 Responsible consumption & production
SDG 13 Climate action
Find out about our responsible management goal