You can publish an open access article in this diamond partnership journal. Authors in this journal are not required to pay an article processing charge (APC)

Author guidelines

Before you start

For queries relating to the status of your paper pre decision, please contact the Editor or Journal Editorial Office. For queries post acceptance, please contact the Supplier Project Manager. These details can be found in the Editorial Team section.

Submit to the journal

Submissions to Maritime Business Review are made using ScholarOne Manuscripts, the online submission and peer review system. Registration and access is available at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/mabr. Full information and guidance on using ScholarOne Manuscripts is available at the Emerald ScholarOne Manuscripts Support Centre: http://mchelp.manuscriptcentral.com/gethelpnow.

Registering on ScholarOne Manuscripts

If you have not yet registered on ScholarOne Manuscripts, please follow the instructions below:

  • Please log on to https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/mabr
  • Click on "Create Account"
  • Follow the on-screen instructions, filling in the requested details before proceeding
  • Your username will be your e-mail address and you have to input a password of at least 8 characters in length and containing two or more numbers
  • Click "Finish" and your account will have been created.

Submitting an article to MABR on ScholarOne Manuscripts

  • Please log on to MABR at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/mabr with your username and password. This will take you through to the welcome page (to consult the Author Guidelines for this journal, click on the homepage link in the "Resources" column)
  • Click on the "Author Centre" button
  • Click on the "Submit a manuscript" link which will take you through to the Manuscript Submission page
  • Complete all fields and browse to upload your article
  • When all required sections are completed, preview your PDF proof
  • Submit your manuscript

Review process

Each paper submitted is reviewed by at least two external reviewers and the Editors to assess its suitability to the journal. All manuscripts which format does not follow the guidelines indicated below will be rejected without further consideration.

Author responsibilities

Our goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous experience at each stage of the review and publication process. There are also some responsibilities that sit with you as the author. Our expectation is that you will:

  • Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication process.
  • Be accountable for all aspects of your work. This includes investigating and resolving any questions about accuracy or research integrity.
  • Treat communications between you and the journal editor as confidential until an editorial decision has been made.
  • Read about our research ethics for authorship. These state that you must:
    • Include anyone who has made a substantial and meaningful contribution to the submission (anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the acknowledgements).
    • Exclude anyone who hasn’t contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be associated with the research.
    • In accordance with COPE’s position statement on AI tools, Large Language Models cannot be credited with authorship as they are incapable of conceptualising a research design without human direction and cannot be accountable for the integrity, originality, and validity of the published work. The author(s) must describe the content created or modified as well as appropriately cite the name and version of the AI tool used; any additional works drawn on by the AI tool should also be appropriately cited and referenced. Standard tools that are used to improve spelling and grammar are not included within the parameters of this guidance. The Editor and Publisher reserve the right to determine whether the use of an AI tool is permissible.
  • If your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find out more about informed consent.

Emerald’s Policy on AI Usage

Emerald’s overarching principles of AI usage:

1) Authors and peer reviewers are responsible and accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work.&

2) AI tools and technology must be used responsibly and transparently.

3) AI tools and technology should not replace human involvement in the publication process but instead supplement it.

Copywriting (creating, drafting, or writing) any part of a submission using generative AI tools and technology to generate new material is not permitted.

Copy-editing (correcting, editing, formatting, modifying, or refining) all or part of an author’s own original existing work using generative AI tools and technology the content to improve its structure and the clarity of the language and grammar is permitted, ensuring users adhere to the following overarching principles.

Emerald’s full policy, including examples of use cases can be found on our Publishing Ethics page.

Research and publishing ethics

Our editors and employees work hard to ensure the content we publish is ethically sound. To help us achieve that goal, we closely follow the advice laid out in the guidelines and flowcharts on the COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) website.

We have also developed our research and publishing ethics guidelines. If you haven’t already read these, we urge you to do so – they will help you avoid the most common publishing ethics issues.

A few key points:

  • Any manuscript you submit to this journal should be original. That means it should not have been published before in its current, or similar, form. Exceptions to this rule are outlined in our pre-print and conference paper policies.  If any substantial element of your paper has been previously published, you need to declare this to the journal editor upon submission. Please note, the journal editor may use Crossref Similarity Check to check on the originality of submissions received. This service compares submissions against a database of 49 million works from 800 scholarly publishers.
  • Your work should not have been submitted elsewhere and should not be under consideration by any other publication.
  • If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it upon submission; this allows the editor to decide how they would like to proceed. Read about conflict of interest in our research and publishing ethics guidelines.
  • By submitting your work to Emerald, you are guaranteeing that the work is not in infringement of any existing copyright.
  • If you have written about a company/individual/organisation in detail using information that is not publicly available, have spent time within that company/organisation, or the work features named/interviewed employees, you will need to clear permission by using the consent to publish form; please also see our permissions guidance for full details. If you have to clear permission with the company/individual/organisation, consent must be given either by the named individual in question or their representative, a board member of the company/organisation, or a HR department representative of the company/organisation.
  • You have an ethical obligation and responsibility to conduct your research in adherence to national and international research ethics guidelines, as well as the ethical principles outlined by your discipline and any relevant authorities, and to be transparent about your research methods in such a way that all involved in the publication process may fairly and appropriately evaluate your work. For all research involving human participants, you must ensure that you have obtained informed consent, meaning that you must inform all participants in your work (or their legal representative) as to why the research is being conducted, whether their anonymity is protected, how their data will be stored and used, and whether there are any associated risks from participation in the study; the submitted work must confirm that informed consent was obtained and detail how this was addressed in accordance with our policy on informed consent.  
  • Where appropriate, you must provide an ethical statement within the submitted work confirming that your research received institutional and national (or international) ethical approval, and that it complies with all relevant guidelines and regulations for studies involving humans, whether that be data, individuals, or samples. Specifically, the statement should contain the name and location of the institutional ethics reviewing committee or review board, the approval number, the date of approval, and the details of the national or international guidelines that were followed, as well as any other relevant information. You should also include details of how the work adheres to relevant consent guidelines along with confirming that informed consent was secured for all participants. The details of these statements should ensure that author and participant anonymity is not compromised. Any work submitted without a suitable ethical statement and details of informed consent for all participants, where required, will be returned to the authors and will not be considered further until appropriate and clear documentation is provided. Emerald reserves the right to reject work without sufficient evidence of informed consent from human participants and ethical approval where required.

Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines

We are a signatory of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines, a framework that supports the reproducibility of research through the adoption of transparent research practices. That means we encourage you to:

  • Cite and fully reference all data, program code, and other methods in your article.
  • Include persistent identifiers, such as a Digital Object Identifier (DOI), in references for datasets and program codes. Persistent identifiers ensure future access to unique published digital objects, such as a piece of text or datasets. Persistent identifiers are assigned to datasets by digital archives, such as institutional repositories and partners in the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social Sciences (Data-PASS).
  • Follow appropriate international and national procedures with respect to data protection, rights to privacy and other ethical considerations, whenever you cite data. For further guidance please refer to our research and publishing ethics guidelines. For an example on how to cite datasets, please refer to the references section below.

Third party copyright permissions

Prior to article submission, authors should clear permission to use any content that has not been created by them.

Failure to do so may lead to lengthy delays in publication. Emerald is unable to publish any article which has permissions pending. The rights Emerald requires are:

  1. Non-exclusive rights to reproduce the material in the article or book chapter.
  2. Print and electronic rights.
  3. Worldwide English language rights.
  4. To use the material for the life of the work (i.e. there should be no time restrictions on the re-use of material e.g. a one-year licence).

When reproducing tables, figures or excerpts (of more than 250 words) from another source, it is expected that:

  1. Authors obtain the necessary written permission in advance from any third party owners of copyright for the use in print and electronic formats of any of their text, illustrations, graphics, or other material, in their manuscript. Permission must also be cleared for any minor adaptations of any work not created by them.
  2. If an author adapts significantly any material, the author must inform the copyright holder of the original work.
  3. Authors obtain any proof of consent statements
  4. Authors must always acknowledge the source in figure captions and refer to the source in the reference list.

Authors should not assume that any content which is freely available on the web is free to use. Authors should check the website for details of the copyright holder to seek permission for re-use.

We are a member of the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers (STM) and participate in the STM permissions guidelines, a reciprocal free exchange of material with other STM publishers.  In some cases, this may mean that you don’t need permission to re-use content. If so, please highlight this at the submission stage.

Please take a few moments to read our guide to publishing permissions to ensure you have met all the requirements, so that we can process your submission without delay.

Open access information

This is a sponsored open access journal, also referred to as diamond open access. Because it is published in partnership with an organisation, your article will be published open access, but you will not have to pay an APC (article processing charge) - publication is free. Your article will be published with a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user licence, which outlines how readers can reuse your work.

You can find out more about our open access routes and read our FAQs on our open research page. 

Find out about open

Informed consent

If your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find out more about informed consent.

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)

Emerald supports the development of, and practical application of consistent ethical standards throughout the scholarly publishing community.

All Emerald’s journals and Editors are members of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which provides advice on all aspects of publication ethics. Emerald follows the Committee’s flowcharts in cases of research and publication misconduct, enabling journals to adhere to the highest ethical standards in publishing. Find out more on Emerald’s publication ethics policy.

Manuscript support services

We are pleased to partner with Editage, a platform that connects you with relevant experts in language support, translation, editing, visuals, consulting, and more. After you’ve agreed a fee, they will work with you to enhance your manuscript and get it submission-ready.

This is an optional service for authors who feel they need a little extra support. It does not guarantee your work will be accepted for review or publication.

Visit Editage

Manuscript requirements

Before you submit your manuscript, it’s important you read and follow the guidelines below. You will also find some useful tips in our structure your journal submission how-to guide.


Format
Article files should be provided in Microsoft Word format. LaTex files can be used if an accompanying PDF document is provided. PDF as a sole file type is not accepted, a PDF must be accompanied by the source file. Acceptable figure file types are listed further below.
Article lengthArticles should be a maximum of 7,000 words in length. This includes all text including references and appendices. Please allow 280 words for each figure or table.
Article titleA title of not more than eight words should be provided.
Author details

All contributing authors’ names should be added to the ScholarOne submission, and their names arranged in the correct order for publication.

  • Correct e-mail addresses should be supplied for each author in their separate author accounts
  • The full name of each author must be present in their author account in the exact format they should appear for publication, including or excluding any middle names or initials as required
  • The affiliation of each contributing author should be correct in their individual author account. The affiliation listed should be where they were based at the time that the research for the paper was conducted
Biographies and acknowledgementsAuthors who wish to include these items should save them together in an MS Word file to be uploaded with the submission. If they are to be included, a brief professional biography of not more than 100 words should be supplied for each named author.
Structured abstract

Authors must supply a structured abstract in their submission, set out under 4-7 sub-headings (see our "How to... write an abstract" guide for practical help and guidance):

  • Purpose (mandatory)
  • Design/methodology/approach (mandatory)
  • Findings (mandatory)
  • Research limitations/implications (if applicable)
  • Practical implications (if applicable)
  • Social implications (if applicable)
  • Originality/value (mandatory)

Maximum is 250 words in total (including keywords and article classification, see below).

Authors should avoid the use of personal pronouns within the structured abstract and body of the paper (e.g. "this paper investigates..." is correct, "I investigate..." is incorrect).

KeywordsAuthors should provide appropriate and short keywords in the ScholarOne submission that encapsulate the principal topics of the paper (see the How to... ensure your article is highly downloaded guide for practical help and guidance on choosing search-engine friendly keywords). The maximum number of keywords is 12.

Whilst Emerald will endeavour to use submitted keywords in the published version, all keywords are subject to approval by Emerald’s in house editorial team and may be replaced by a matching term to ensure consistency.
Article classificationAuthors must categorize their paper as part of the ScholarOne submission process. The category which most closely describes their paper should be selected from the list below.

Research paper. This category covers papers which report on any type of research undertaken by the author(s). The research may involve the construction or testing of a model or framework, action research, testing of data, market research or surveys, empirical, scientific or clinical research.

Viewpoint. Any paper, where content is dependent on the author's opinion and interpretation, should be included in this category; this also includes journalistic pieces.

Technical paper. Describes and evaluates technical products, processes or services.

Conceptual paper. These papers will not be based on research but will develop hypotheses. The papers are likely to be discursive and will cover philosophical discussions and comparative studies of others' work and thinking.

Case study. Case studies describe actual interventions or experiences within organizations. They may well be subjective and will not generally report on research. A description of a legal case or a hypothetical case study used as a teaching exercise would also fit into this category.

Literature review. It is expected that all types of paper cite any relevant literature so this category should only be used if the main purpose of the paper is to annotate and/or critique the literature in a particular subject area. It may be a selective bibliography providing advice on information sources or it may be comprehensive in that the paper's aim is to cover the main contributors to the development of a topic and explore their different views.

General review. This category covers those papers which provide an overview or historical examination of some concept, technique or phenomenon. The papers are likely to be more descriptive or instructional ("how to" papers) than discursive.
HeadingsHeadings must be concise, with a clear indication of the distinction between the hierarchy of headings. 

The preferred format is for first level headings to be presented in bold format and subsequent sub-headings to be presented in medium italics.
Notes/endnotesNotes or endnotes should be used only if absolutely necessary and must be identified in the text by consecutive numbers, enclosed in square brackets and listed at the end of the article.
Figures

All Figures (charts, diagrams, line drawings, web pages/screenshots, and photographic images) should be submitted in electronic form. 

All figures should be of high quality, legible and numbered consecutively with arabic numerals. Graphics may be supplied in colour to facilitate their appearance on the online database.

  • Figures created in MS Word, MS PowerPoint, MS Excel, Illustrator should be supplied in their native formats. Electronic figures created in other applications should be copied from the origination software and pasted into a blank MS Word document or saved and imported into an MS Word document or alternatively create a PDF file from the origination software.
  • Figures which cannot be supplied as above are acceptable in the standard image formats which are: .pdf, .ai, and .eps. If you are unable to supply graphics in these formats then please ensure they are .tif, .jpeg, or .bmp at a resolution of at least 300dpi and at least 10cm wide.
  • To prepare web pages/screenshots simultaneously press the "Alt" and "Print screen" keys on the keyboard, open a blank Microsoft Word document and simultaneously press "Ctrl" and "V" to paste the image. (Capture all the contents/windows on the computer screen to paste into MS Word, by simultaneously pressing "Ctrl" and "Print screen".)
  • Photographic images should be submitted electronically and of high quality. They should be saved as .tif or .jpeg files at a resolution of at least 300dpi and at least 10cm wide. Digital camera settings should be set at the highest resolution/quality possible.
TablesTables should be typed and included in a separate file to the main body of the article. The position of each table should be clearly labelled in the body text of article with corresponding labels being clearly shown in the separate file. 

Ensure that any superscripts or asterisks are shown next to the relevant items and have corresponding explanations displayed as footnotes to the table, figure or plate.
Supplementary files

Where tables, figures, appendices, and other additional content are supplementary to the article but not critical to the reader’s understanding of it, you can choose to host these supplementary files alongside your article on Insight, Emerald’s content-hosting platform (this is Emerald's recommended option as we are able to ensure the data remain accessible), or on an alternative trusted online repository.

Emerald recommends authors that they use the following two trusted lists of repositories: https://commons.datacite.org/repositories and https://www.re3data.org to identify the most suitable repository. Any and all supplementary material must be present/provided with the initial submission.

If you choose to host your supplementary files on Insight, you must submit these as separate files alongside your article. Files should be clearly labelled in such a way that makes it clear they are supplementary; Emerald recommends that the file name is descriptive and that it follows the format 'Supplementary_material_appendix_1' or 'Supplementary tables'. All supplementary material must be mentioned at the appropriate moment in the main text of the article; there is no need to include the content of the file only the file name. A link to the supplementary material will be added to the article during production, and the material will be made available alongside the main text of the article at the point of EarlyCite publication.

Please note that Emerald will not make any changes to the material; it will not be copy-edited or typeset, and authors will not receive proofs of this content. Emerald therefore strongly recommends that you style all supplementary material ahead of acceptance of the article.
Emerald Insight can host the following file types and extensions:

  • Adobe Acrobat (.pdf)
  • MS Word document (.doc, .docx)
  • MS Excel (.xls, xlsx)
  • MS PowerPoint (.pptx)
  • Image (.png, .jpeg, .gif)
  • Plain ASCII text (.txt)
  • PostScript (.ps)
  • Rich Text Format (.rtf)

If you choose to use an alternative trusted online repository, you should ensure that the supplementary material is hosted on the repository ahead of submission, and then include a link only to the repository within the article. It is the responsibility of the submitting author to ensure that the material is free to access and that it remains permanently available. Where an alternative trusted online repository is used, the files hosted should always be presented as read-only; please be aware that such usage risks compromising your anonymity during the review process if the repository contains any information that may enable the reviewer to identify you; as such, we recommend that all links to alternative repositories are reviewed carefully prior to submission.

Please note that extensive supplementary material may be subject to peer review; this is at the discretion of the journal Editor and dependent on the content of the material (for example, whether including it would support the reviewer making a decision on the article during the peer review process).

ReferencesReferences to other publications must be in Harvard style and carefully checked for completeness, accuracy and consistency. This is very important in an electronic environment because it enables your readers to exploit the Reference Linking facility on the database and link back to the works you have cited through CrossRef.

You should cite publications in the text: (Adams, 2006) using the first named author's name or (Adams and Brown, 2006) citing both names of two, or (Adams et al., 2006), when there are three or more authors. At the end of the paper a reference list in alphabetical order should be supplied:
For booksSurname, Initials (year), Title of Book, Publisher, Place of publication.

e.g. Harrow, R. (2005), No Place to Hide, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
For book chaptersSurname, Initials (year), "Chapter title", Editor's Surname, Initials, Title of Book, Publisher, Place of publication, pages.

e.g. Calabrese, F.A. (2005), "The early pathways: theory to practice – a continuum", in Stankosky, M. (Ed.), Creating the Discipline of Knowledge Management, Elsevier, New York, NY, pp. 15-20.
For journalsSurname, Initials (year), "Title of article", Journal Name, volume issue, pages.

e.g. Capizzi, M.T. and Ferguson, R. (2005), "Loyalty trends for the twenty-first century", Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 72-80.
For published 
conference proceedings
Surname, Initials (year of publication), "Title of paper", in Surname, Initials (Ed.), Title of published proceeding which may include place and date(s) held, Publisher, Place of publication, Page numbers.

e.g. Jakkilinki, R., Georgievski, M. and Sharda, N. (2007), "Connecting destinations with an ontology-based e-tourism planner", in Information and communication technologies in tourism 2007 proceedings of the international conference in Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2007, Springer-Verlag, Vienna, pp. 12-32.
For unpublished 
conference proceedings
Surname, Initials (year), "Title of paper", paper presented at Name of Conference, date of conference, place of conference, available at: URL if freely available on the internet (accessed date).

e.g. Aumueller, D. (2005), "Semantic authoring and retrieval within a wiki", paper presented at the European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 29 May-1 June, Heraklion, Crete, available at: http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/file/aumueller05wiksar.pdf (accessed 20 February 2007).
For working papersSurname, Initials (year), "Title of article", working paper [number if available], Institution or organization, Place of organization, date.

e.g. Moizer, P. (2003), "How published academic research can inform policy decisions: the case of mandatory rotation of audit appointments", working paper, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds, Leeds, 28 March.
For encyclopedia entries 
(with no author or editor)
Title of Encyclopedia (year) "Title of entry", volume, edition, Title of Encyclopedia, Publisher, Place of publication, pages.

e.g. Encyclopaedia Britannica (1926) "Psychology of culture contact", Vol. 1, 13th ed., Encyclopaedia Britannica, London and New York, NY, pp. 765-71.

(For authored entries please refer to book chapter guidelines above)
For newspaper 
articles (authored)
Surname, Initials (year), "Article title", Newspaper, date, pages.

e.g. Smith, A. (2008), "Money for old rope", Daily News, 21 January, pp. 1, 3-4.
For newspaper 
articles (non-authored)
Newspaper (year), "Article title", date, pages.

e.g. Daily News (2008), "Small change", 2 February, p. 7.
For archival or other unpublished sourcesSurname, Initials, (year), "Title of document", Unpublished Manuscript, collection name, inventory record, name of archive, location of archive.

e.g. Litman, S. (1902), "Mechanism & Technique of Commerce", Unpublished Manuscript, Simon Litman Papers, Record series 9/5/29 Box 3, University of Illinois Archives, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
For electronic sourcesIf available online, the full URL should be supplied at the end of the reference, as well as a date that the resource was accessed.

e.g. Castle, B. (2005), "Introduction to web services for remote portlets", available at: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-wsrp/ (accessed 12 November 2007).

Standalone URLs, i.e. without an author or date, should be included either within parentheses within the main text, or preferably set as a note (roman numeral within square brackets within text followed by the full URL address at the end of the paper).

Submit your manuscript

There are a number of key steps you should follow to ensure a smooth and trouble-free submission.

Double check your manuscript

Before submitting your work, it is your responsibility to check that the manuscript is complete, grammatically correct, and without spelling or typographical errors. A few other important points:

  • Give the journal aims and scope a final read. Is your manuscript definitely a good fit? If it isn’t, the editor may decline it without peer review.
  • Does your manuscript comply with our research and publishing ethics guidelines?
  • Have you cleared any necessary publishing permissions?
  • Have you followed all the formatting requirements laid out in these author guidelines?
  • Does the manuscript contain any information that might help the reviewer identify you? This could compromise the anonymous peer review process. A few tips:
    • If you need to refer to your own work, use wording such as ‘previous research has demonstrated’ not ‘our previous research has demonstrated’.
    • If you need to refer to your own, currently unpublished work, don’t include this work in the reference list.
    • Any acknowledgments or author biographies should be uploaded as separate files.
    • Carry out a final check to ensure that no author names appear anywhere in the manuscript. This includes in figures or captions.

You will find a helpful submission checklist on the website Think.Check.Submit.

The submission process

All manuscripts should be submitted through our editorial system by the corresponding author.

A separate author account is required for each journal you submit to. If this is your first time submitting to this journal, please choose the Create an account or Register now option in the editorial system. If you already have an Emerald login, you are welcome to reuse the existing username and password here.

Please note, the next time you log into the system, you will be asked for your username. This will be the email address you entered when you set up your account.

Don't forget to add your ORCiD ID during the submission process. It will be embedded in your published article, along with a link to the ORCiD registry allowing others to easily match you with your work.

Don’t have one yet? It only takes a few moments to register for a free ORCiD identifier.

Visit the ScholarOne support centre for further help and guidance.

Final submission

Please ensure that the manuscript is complete, grammatically correct and without spelling or typographical errors. Before submitting, authors should check their submission completeness using the available Article Submission Checklist. Proofs will be e-mailed prior to publication.

What you can expect next

You will receive an automated email from the journal editor, confirming your successful submission. It will provide you with a manuscript number, which will be used in all future correspondence about your submission. If you have any reason to suspect the confirmation email you receive might be fraudulent, please contact the journal editor in the first instance.

Post submission

Review and decision process

Each submission is checked by the editor. At this stage, they may choose to decline or unsubmit your manuscript if it doesn’t fit the journal aims and scope, or they feel the language/manuscript quality is too low.

If they think it might be suitable for the publication, they will send it to at least two independent referees for double anonymous peer review.  Once these reviewers have provided their feedback, the editor may decide to accept your manuscript, request minor or major revisions, or decline your work.

While all journals work to different timescales, the goal is that the editor will inform you of their first decision within 60 days.

During this period, we will send you automated updates on the progress of your manuscript via our submission system, or you can log in to check on the current status of your paper.  Each time we contact you, we will quote the manuscript number you were given at the point of submission. If you receive an email that does not match these criteria, it could be fraudulent and we recommend you contact the journal editor in the first instance.

If your submission is accepted

Copyright

Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form, or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see Emerald's originality guidelines for details. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. The editor may make use of iThenticate software for checking the originality of submissions received.

All accepted authors are sent an email with a link to a licence form. This should be checked for accuracy, for example whether contact and affiliation details are up to date and your name is spelled correctly, and then returned to us electronically. 

Proofing and typesetting

Once we have received your completed licence form, the article will pass directly into the production process. We will carry out editorial checks, copyediting, and typesetting and then return proofs to you (if you are the corresponding author) for your review. This is your opportunity to correct any typographical errors, grammatical errors or incorrect author details. We can’t accept requests to rewrite texts at this stage.

When the page proofs are finalised, the fully typeset and proofed version of record is published online. This is referred to as the EarlyCite version. While an EarlyCite article has yet to be assigned to a volume or issue, it does have a digital object identifier (DOI) and is fully citable. It will be compiled into an issue according to the journal’s issue schedule, with papers being added by chronological date of publication.

How to share your paper

Visit our author rights page to find out how you can reuse and share your work.

To find tips on increasing the visibility of your published paper, read about how to promote your work.

Correcting inaccuracies in your published paper

Sometimes errors are made during the research, writing and publishing processes. When these issues arise, we have the option of withdrawing the paper or introducing a correction notice. Find out more about our article withdrawal and correction policies.

Need to make a change to the author list? See our frequently asked questions (FAQs) below.

Archiving policy

Emerald provides perpetual access for all eJournal and book content by working with digital preservation schemes Portico, LOCKSS and CLOCKSS. Find out more about Emerald’s archiving policy.

Frequently asked questions

Need to make a change to the author list? See our frequently asked questions (FAQs) below.

Is there a submission fee
for the journal?

Maritime Business Review operated under diamond open access model, where authors do not have to pay for submission. 

The only time we will ever ask you for money to publish in an Emerald journal is if you have chosen to publish via the gold open access route. You will be asked to pay an APC (article processing charge) once your paper has been accepted (unless it is a sponsored open access journal). 

Read about our APCs

At no other time will you be asked to contribute financially towards your article’s publication. If you haven’t chosen gold open access and you receive an email which appears to be from Emerald, asking you for payment to publish, please contact the journal editor in the first instance.

How can I become
a reviewer for a journal?
Please contact the editor for the journal, with a copy of your CV. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page.
Who do I contact if I want to find out which volume and issue my accepted paper will appear in?Typically, papers are added to an issue according to their date of publication. If you would like to know in advance which issue your paper will appear in, please contact the content editor of the journal. You will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. Once your paper has been published in an issue, you will be notified by email.
Who do I contact if I have
a query about my submission?
Please email the journal editor – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page. If you ever suspect an email you’ve received from Emerald might not be genuine, you are welcome to verify it with the content editor for the journal, whose contact details can be found on the editorial team tab on this page.
Is my paper suitable
for the journal?
If you’ve read the aims and scope on the journal landing page and are still unsure whether your paper is suitable for the journal, please email the editor and include your paper's title and structured abstract. They will be able to advise on your manuscript’s suitability. You will find their contact details on the Editorial team tab on this page.
How do I make a change to the list of authors once the manuscript has been submitted?Authorship and the order in which the authors are listed on the paper should be agreed prior to submission. We have a right first time policy on this and no changes can be made to the list once submitted. If you have made an error in the submission process, please email the Journal Editorial Office who will look into your request – you will find their contact details on the editorial team tab on this page.
Editorial team
  • Co-Editors-in-Chief

    • Chin-Shan Lu
      Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Taiwan
      [email protected]
    • Tsz Leung Yip
      Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
      [email protected]
  • Consulting Editor

    • T.C. Edwin Cheng
      Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
      [email protected]
  • Editor

    • Kee-hung Lai
      The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
      [email protected]
    • Y.H. Venus Lun
      Logistics & Supply Chain MultiTech R&D Centre, Hong Kong
      [email protected]
    • Kuo-Chung Shang
      Department of Transportation Science, College of Maritime Science and Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Taiwan
      [email protected]
    • Christina W.Y. Wong
      The Hong Kong Polytechnic University - China
      [email protected]
  • Associate Editor

    • Ana Cristina F. C. Paixão Casaca
      World of Shipping Portugal, Portugal and CIMOSM, ISEL, Multifunctional Systems Modelling and Optimization Research Centre, Portugal
      [email protected]
    • Dong Yang
      Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
      [email protected]
  • Managing Editor

    • Sik Kwan Tai
      Faculty of Business and Management (FBM), United International College (UIC), Beijing Normal University-Hong Kong Baptist University, China
      [email protected]
  • Publishing Services Manager

  • Journal Editorial Office (For queries related to pre-acceptance)

  • Supplier Project Manager (For queries related to post-acceptance)

  • Editorial Board

    • Emrah Bulut
      Department of Business Administration, Yildiz Technical University, Turkey
      [email protected]
    • Stephen Cahoon
      Sense-T and Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Australia
      [email protected]
    • Pierre Cariou
      Kedge Business School, France
      [email protected]
    • Chia-Hsun Chang
      Department of Maritime and Mechanical Engineering, Liverpool John Moores University, UK
      [email protected]
    • Poti Chaopaisarn
      Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
      [email protected]
    • Jihong Chen
      College of Management, Shenzhen University, China
      [email protected]
    • Peggy Shu-Ling Chen
      Centre for Maritime and Logistics Management, Australian Maritime College, University of Tasmania, Australia
      [email protected]
    • Shun Chen
      College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China
      [email protected]
    • Michael Dooms
      Department of Business, Faculty of Economic and Social Sciences, University of Brussels, Belgium
      [email protected]
    • Branislav Dragovic
      Maritime Faculty, University of Montenegro, Kotor, Montenegro
      [email protected]
    • Cesar Ducruet
      Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR 7235 EconomiX, France
      [email protected]
    • James Fawcett
      USC Dornsife College of Letters, Arts & Sciences, Environmental Studies Program, University of Southern California, USA
      [email protected]
    • Xiaowen Fu
      Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
      [email protected]
    • Stephen X. Gong
      International Business School Suzhou, Xi'an Jiaotong - Liverpool University, China
      [email protected]
    • Jane Haider
      Logistics and Operations Management Section, Cardiff University, UK
      [email protected]
    • Haiying Jia
      Department of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics, Norway
      [email protected]
    • Liping Jiang
      Department of Operations Management, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark
      [email protected]
    • Manolis G. Kavussanos
      Department of Accounting and Finance, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece
      [email protected]
    • Tomoya Kawasaki
      Department of Systems Innovation, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Japan
      [email protected]
    • Ioannis N. Lagoudis
      Department of Maritime Studies, University of Piraeus, Greece
      [email protected]
    • Po-Lin Lai
      Department of International Logistics, Chung-Ang University, South Korea
      [email protected]
    • Jasmine Siu Lee Lam
      Department of Technology, Management and Economics, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Denmark
      [email protected]
    • Maria B Lekakou
      Department of Shipping, Trade and Transport, University of the Aegean, Greece
      [email protected]
    • Taih-Cherng Lirn
      National Taiwan Ocean University - Taiwan
      [email protected]
    • Daniel Seong-Hyeok Moon
      Shipping and Port Management, World Maritime University, Sweden
      [email protected]
    • Paul Myburgh
      Auckland University of Technology Law School; Centre for Maritime Law, National University of Singapore
      [email protected]
    • Man Wo Ng
      Department of Information Technology, Decision Sciences and Maritime and Supply Chain Management, Old Dominion University, USA
      [email protected]
    • Theo Notteboom
      Shanghai Maritime University, China / Ghent University, Belgium / University of Antwerp, Belgium
      [email protected]
    • Irwin U.J. Ooi
      Faculty of Law, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia
      [email protected]
    • Kelvin Ka Liong Pang
      School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
      [email protected]
    • Pairach Piboonrungroj
      Supply Chain Economics Research Centre (SCERC), Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
      [email protected]
    • Andrew Potter
      Cardiff University - UK
      [email protected]
    • Young-Joon Seo
      School of Economics & Trade, College of Economics & Business Administration, Kyungpook National University, South Korea
      [email protected]
    • Joshua D. Shackman
      Department of International Business and Logistics, California State University Maritime, USA
      [email protected]
    • Dong-Wook Song
      World Maritime University - Sweden
      [email protected]
    • Simon Su
      ASA Projects Limited, Hong Kong
      [email protected]
    • Vinh V. Thai
      School of Business IT & Logistics, RMIT University, Australia
      [email protected]
    • Judy Tong
      Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, Faculty of Business, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
      [email protected]
    • Ping Wang
      Department of Maritime Business Administration, Texas A&M University, Galveston Campus, USA
      [email protected]
    • Wen-Yao Grace Wang | Federal Maritime Commission, USA
      Dr Wang is the Director of Competition Analysis at the Federal Maritime Commission whose mission is to ensure a competitive and reliable international ocean transportation supply chain. Disclaimer - This involvement is the result of her independent time and does not represent the view of the FMC or the United States government.
      [email protected]
    • H. T. Kenneth Wong
      South China Commercial, Hutchison Port Holdings Limited, Hong Kong
      [email protected]
    • Jingjing Xu
      Vice Chancellor’s Office, Coventry University, UK
      [email protected]
    • Ching-Chiao Yang
      Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
      [email protected]
    • Gi-Tae Yeo
      Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University, Korea
      [email protected]
    • Pengfei Zhang
      Navigation College, Jimei University, China
      [email protected]
    • Jianfeng Zheng
      Transportation Management College, Dalian Maritime University, China
      [email protected]
Indexing & metrics

Citation metrics

Scopus Logo

4.5

CiteScore 2024

Scopus Logo

4.5

CiteScore 2024

Further information

CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals.

 

Calculating the CiteScore is based on the number of citations to documents (articles, reviews, conference papers, book chapters, and data papers) by a journal over four years, divided by the number of the same document types indexed in Scopus and published in those same four years.

 

For more information and methodology visit the Scopus definition

 

Scopus Logo

5.5

CiteScore Tracker 2025

(updated monthly)

Scopus Logo

5.5

CiteScore Tracker 2025

(updated monthly)

Further information

 CiteScore is a simple way of measuring the citation impact of sources, such as journals.

 

CiteScore Tracker is calculated in the same way as CiteScore, but for the current year rather than previous, complete years.

 

The CiteScore Tracker calculation is updated every month, as a current indication of a title's performance.

 

For more information and methodology visit the Scopus definition

Clarivate analytics logo

2.4

2024 Impact Factor

Clarivate analytics logo

2.4

2024 Impact Factor

Further information

The Journal Impact Factor is published each year by Clarivate Analytics. It is a measure of the number of times an average paper in a particular journal is cited during the preceding two years.

 

For more information and methodology see Clarivate Analytics

Clarivate analytics logo

2.4

5-year Impact Factor (2024)

Clarivate analytics logo

2.4

5-year Impact Factor (2024)

Further information

A base of five years may be more appropriate for journals in certain fields because the body of citations may not be large enough to make reasonable comparisons, or it may take longer than two years to publish and distribute leading to a longer period before others cite the work.

 

Actual value is intentionally only displayed for the most recent year. Earlier values are available in the Journal Citation Reports from Clarivate Analytics.


Publication timeline

Time to first decision

44

days

Time to first decision

44

days

Further information

Time to first decision, expressed in days, the "first decision" occurs when the journal’s editorial team reviews the peer reviewers’ comments and recommendations. Based on this feedback, they decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript.

Data is taken from submissions between 1st April 2024 and 31st March 2025

Acceptance to publication

29

days

Acceptance to publication

29

days

Further information

Acceptance to publication, expressed in days, is the average time between when the journal’s editorial team decide whether to accept, reject, or request revisions for the manuscript and the date of publication in the journal. 

 

Data is taken from the previous 12 months (Last updated July 2024)

Acceptance rate

27.6

%

Acceptance rate

27.6

%

Further information

The acceptance rate is a measurement of how many manuscripts a journal accepts for publication compared to the total number of manuscripts submitted expressed as a percentage %

Data is taken from submissions between 1st April 2024 and 31st March 2025.


Usage

Downloads

13533

Articles

Downloads

13533

Articles

Further information

This figure is the total amount of downloads for all articles published early cite in the last 12 months

 

(Last updated: April 2025)

This journal is included in the following abstract and indexing services:

  • ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)
  • ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)
  • Australian Business Deans Council (ABDC) Journal Quality List
  • British Library
  • Business Premium Collection (ProQuest)
  • Cabells
  • EBSCO Discovery Service
  • Econbiz
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Clarivate Analytics)
  • ERIM Journals List (EJL)
  • Google Scholar
  • Norwegian Register for Scientific Journal
  • ProQuest Central
  • ProQuest Central Basic (Korea)
  • ProQuest Central Essentials
  • ProQuest Central Student
  • ProQuest One Business
  • Publicly Available Content Database (ProQuest)
  • Scopus
  • Summons (ProQuest)
  • Taiwan Social Sciences Citation Index (TSSCI)
  • WorldCat

ESCI

Reviewers

Reviewer information


Peer review process

This journal engages in a double-anonymous peer review process, which strives to match the expertise of a reviewer with the submitted manuscript. Reviews are completed with evidence of thoughtful engagement with the manuscript, provide constructive feedback, and add value to the overall knowledge and information presented in the manuscript.

Mission

The mission of the peer review process is to achieve excellence and rigour in scholarly publications and research.

Vision

Our vision is to give voice to professionals in the subject area who contribute unique and diverse scholarly perspectives to the field.

Values

The journal values diverse perspectives from the field and reviewers who provide critical, constructive, and respectful feedback to authors. Reviewers come from a variety of organizations, careers, and backgrounds from around the world.

Ethics

All invitations to review, abstracts, manuscripts, and reviews should be kept confidential. Reviewers must not share their review or information about the review process with anyone without the agreement of the editors and authors involved, even after publication. This also applies to other reviewers’ “comments to author” which are shared with you on decision.


Resources to guide you through the review process

Discover practical tips and guidance on all aspects of peer review in our reviewers' section. See how being a reviewer could benefit your career, and discover what's involved in shaping a review.

More reviewer information


Calls for papers & news

Calls for papers

Closes:
30 Oct 2026

Sustainability and Digitalisation in Maritime Logistics

Maritime Business Review

IntroductionThe maritime logistics sector is undergoing a rapid transformation driven by urgent sustainability goals and accelerated digital innovation. Global regulatory pressures, such as the IMO’s decarbonisation targets, and societal ...

Guest editor(s):
Chia-Hsun Chang, Zaili Yang, Wei (Vera) Zhang, Adolf KY Ng
Sustainability and Digitalisation in Maritime Logistics
Closes:
30 Apr 2022

Post COVID-19 Global Trade And Business Environment And Maritime Supply Chain

Maritime Business Review

Since January 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused widespread impacts on virtually every sector of the global economy, including world trade and global supply chains. The unprecedented effect of such a pandemic and the resultant restriction rule...

Post COVID-19 Global Trade And Business Environment And Maritime Supply Chain

News

Thank you to our 2021 Reviewers

The publishing and editorial teams would like to thank the following for their invaluable service as 2021 reviewers for Maritime Business Review. We are very grateful for all the contributions made. It is with their help that the journal has been ...

16/09/2022
Thank you to our 2021 Reviewers

Maritime Business Review - Top Cited Articles (2018-2020)

Top Cited Articles (2018-2020)   A novel memetic algorithm with a deterministic parameter control fo...

29/04/2021
Maritime Business Review - Top Cited Articles (2018-2020)

2019 Literati Awards Winners

Outstanding Paper Volume 3 issue 2 A game theory application of a cruise value chain – the case of China Grace...

09/07/2020
2019 Literati Awards Winners

Literati awards

Maritime Business Review- Literati Award Winners 2025

We are pleased to announce our 2025 Literati Award winners.Outstanding PaperRenewable energy options for ...

Maritime Business Review- Literati Award Winners 2025

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2024

We are pleased to announce our 2024 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper The dynamics of value propositions through...

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2024
2023 literati award winners banner

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2023

We are pleased to announce our 2023 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Uncovering the impact of C...

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2023

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2022

We are pleased to announce our 2022 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Blockchain technology in supp...

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2022

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2021

We are pleased to announce our 2021 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Impacts of regional integrati...

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2021

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2020

We are pleased to announce our 2020 Literati Award winners. Outstanding Paper Influence of transportation infrastructure on the rel...

Maritime Business Review - Literati Award Winners 2020

Maritime Business Review is a peer-reviewed journal on maritime business environment, covering maritime business using a multi-disciplinary approach. Published in association with Pacific Star Group Educational Foundation.

ISSN: 2397-3757
eISSN: 2397-3765

You can publish an open access article in this diamond partnership journal. Authors in this journal are not required to pay an article processing charge (APC)

Aims and scope

When submitting a manuscript, authors will be taken to a service called Paperpal Preflight, an AI-driven tool that checks manuscripts against the journal's author guidelines. Authors are free to use or bypass this step and submit directly to ScholarOne.

Maritime Business Review (MABR) aims to provide the latest research insights and state-of-the-art theory and management practice to maritime researchers and practitioners on all aspects of maritime business.

MABR will serve all maritime business disciplines that include, but are not limited to:

  • Shipping market analysis and forecasting
  • Customer services and marketing
  • Organisational behaviour in maritime business
  • Innovation management
  • Maritime security
  • Safety management
  • Shipping finance
  • Marine insurance
  • Ship chartering
  • Bulk shipping
  • Fleet management
  • Maritime education and training
  • Human resource management
  • Strategic alliance
  • Intermodal transport operations
  • Port management and operations
  • Terminal management
  • Green ports
  • Cruise operations and management
  • Shipping sustainability and social responsibility
  • Technology in maritime business
  • Legal aspects in maritime business

Open access

All articles published in Maritime Business Review (MABR) are published Open Access under a CCBY 4.0 licence.

MABR is published by Emerald Publishing on behalf of Pacific Star Group, the owner of the journal. MABR is published under a diamond access arrangement, in that all charges for publishing an article in MABR are funded by Pacific Star Group. There is no charge to the author.

Transparency statement for Maritime Business Review 

  1. Journal Ownership: Maritime Business Review is published by Emerald Publishing on behalf of Pacific Star Group Educational Foundation.
  2. Governing Body: The editorial team is appointed and managed by Pacific Star Group Educational Foundation. The journal is governed by the editorial team in collaboration with Emerald Publishing.
  3. Peer Review Process: The journal operates a double-blind peer review model. All articles undergo an initial assessment by the journal editor. If they are considered suitable for consideration, articles will then be a reviewed by a minimum of two external reviewers to assess suitability for publication. Final responsibility for editorial decisions rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.
  4. Editorial team/contact information: Contact details for the editorial team can be found on the journal homepage here. Queries may also be directed to Emerald Publishing as follows: Serena Tsai - [email protected]
  5. Copyright: Before 2024, the copyright in all articles was held by Pacific Star Group Educational Foundation. All articles in the journal are published as licensed re-use rights only and with free access. This allows readers to access the work free of charge, and authors retain certain re-use rights. For any re-use requests outside of the retained author rights, please contact Pacific Star Group Educational Foundation. Since January 2024, the journal has been publishing under Diamond Open Access model Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY-4.0). This allows authors to retain copyright of their work whilst others can share, use and build upon this work created as long as appropriate attribution is given.  
  6. Author Fees: The journal is published under an agreement where all costs associated with publishing an article in the journal are funded by Pacific Star Group Educational Foundation.
  7. Allegations of Misconduct: In the event of any allegation of research or publication misconduct the publisher and editor will adhere to COPE guidelines in dealing with such allegations.
  8. Conflicts of interest: Authors are asked to declare any financial or ethical conflicts of interest upon submitting their work to the journal.
  9. Frequency: The journal publishes four issues per annum.
  10. Access: All journal articles are published Free Access on EmeraldInsight.com - https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/2397-3757
  11. Revenue sources: The journal is published under a free to read arrangement, in that all costs associated with publishing an article in the journal are funded by the Pacific Star Group Educational Foundation.
  12. Advertising: The journal does not accept direct advertising.
  13. Archiving: Emerald provides perpetual access for all e-journal content by working with digital preservation schemes Portico, LOCKSS and CLOCKSS.
  14. Direct marketing: On occasion the journal will use direct marketing activities (primarily email campaigns) to raise awareness of the journal and to invite authors to submit articles. Marketing activities are conducted by Pacific Star Group Educational Foundation unless otherwise agreed with Emerald.

This statement was updated by Serena Tsai (Emerald Publishing) on 26th August 2025.