Age differences in the adoption of technology at work: a review and recommendations for managerial practice

Authors: Luca Fazi, University of Bologna, Italy; Sara Zaniboni, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy and ETH Zurich, Switzerland; and, Mo Wang, University of Florida, USA

What happens when age differences meet workplace technology?

It may appear to be a simple technical challenge, but it is actually a complex human one. As organisations increasingly rely on digital tools, artificial intelligence, and information systems, the success of these technologies depends not only on their design but also on whether employees adopt and use them. One key factor shaping this process is age. Workplaces now commonly include four generations working together, making age-related differences in technology adoption a critical issue for organisations. 
Understanding these differences is essential for organisations that want technology to improve productivity rather than become a barrier.

The ROI of technological progress

Technology has become a strategic asset in modern organisations, but its benefits only emerge when workers actually use it. Research shows that technology usage tends to decline with age, although the reasons behind this pattern are complex. 
To understand adoption, scholars rely on models such as the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). These frameworks identify several key factors influencing technology adoption:

• Performance expectancy – individual believes that using a system will help them improve their job performance
• Effort expectancy – individual believes that using the system will be free of effort
• Social influence – Individual perceives the importance of whether others believe he or she should use the new system
• Facilitating conditions – individual believes that an organisational and technical infrastructure exists to support use of the system
• Attitude toward technology – person has a favorable or unfavorable evaluation or appraisal of using the technology
  Together, these factors shape behavioural intention to use technology and actual use behaviour in the workplace.

What age changes in technology adoption

1. Attitudes toward technology
   Younger workers generally hold more positive attitudes toward technology, especially when it is designed for their own use. However, attitudes influence adoption for workers of all ages.
2. Perceived usefulness
   Older workers often recognise the practical usefulness of workplace technologies, drawing on experience and integrative thinking.
   In contrast, younger workers are more likely to value technologies related to collaboration, networking, and learning.
3. Ease of use
   Perceptions of how easy technology is to use are generally similar across age groups, and this factor influences adoption similarly for younger and older employees.
4. Social influence
   Older workers may be more sensitive to social pressure, for example, expectations from colleagues or managers, to adopt certain technologies.
5. Facilitating conditions
   Older employees tend to depend more on support systems such as training, IT assistance, and guidance, while younger workers focus more on accessibility and availability of technology.
6. Actual technology use
   Across most studies, younger workers adopt and use workplace technologies more frequently than older workers.

Challenges for organisations

Age differences in technology adoption present several challenges for organisations:

• Workers differ in motivation, experience, and confidence with technology
• Technology adoption varies by industry, country, and type of technology
• Age interacts with other factors such as gender

These differences mean that one-size-fits-all technology implementation strategies are unlikely to succeed.

Managing technology adoption in an age-diverse workforce

The review suggests several practical strategies for organisations.

Encourage learning across age-groups

Younger employees can share technological confidence and familiarity, while older workers can offer insight into how technology improves work performance.

Communicate the benefits of technology

Organisations should clearly explain how technologies improve job performance and career development, particularly for younger employees who are strongly influenced by perceived usefulness.

Provide targeted support

Older workers benefit from IT support, training, and knowledge-sharing mechanisms, while younger workers require easy access and availability of technological tools.

Tailor technology strategies

Effective age-oriented implementation should also consider:

• Type of technology
• Organisational sector
• Cultural context

Balancing technology and workforce diversity

Technology adoption is not simply a technical issue, it is deeply connected to human differences, motivations, and experiences. Age shapes how employees perceive the tool and its characteristics.

Organisations that recognise these differences can transform age diversity into an advantage: combining the technological enthusiasm of younger workers with the experience and strategic perspective of older ones.

The challenge is not only to introduce new technologies, but to ensure that all age-groups in the workforce can use them effectively.

Read the full research here.

Author bio:

Luca Fazi, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (pictured right)

Sara Zaniboni, Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy and Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, and

Mo Wang, Management Department, Warrington College of Business, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

References

1. Brown, S.A., Dennis, A.R. and Venkatesh, V. (2010), “Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp. 9-54, doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222270201.
2. Carstensen, L.L., Isaacowitz, D.M. and Charles, S.T. (1999), “Taking time seriously: a theory of socioemotional selectivity”, American Psychologist, Vol. 54 No. 3, pp. 165-181, doi: 10.1037// 0003-066x.54.3.165.
3. Davis, F.D. (1987), “Technology acceptance model: TAM”, Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, Vol. 205 No. 219, pp. 1-33.
4. Fasbender, U., Gerpott, F.H. and Rinker, L. (2023), “Getting ready for the future, is it worth it? A dual pathway model of age and technology acceptance at work”, Work, Ageing and Retirement, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 358-375, doi: 10.1093/workar/waac035.
5. Marzi, G., Balzano, M., Caputo, A. and Pellegrini, M.M. (2024), “Guidelines for bibliometric systematic literature reviews: 10 steps to combine analysis, synthesis and theory development”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 81-103, doi: 10.1111/ ijmr.12381.
6. Truxillo, D.M., Cadiz, D.M., Rineer, J.R., Zaniboni, S. and Fraccaroli, F. (2012), “A lifespan perspective on job design: fitting the worker to the job to promote job satisfaction, engagement, and performance”, Organizational Psychology Review, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 340-360, doi: 10.1177/2041386612454043.
7. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003), “User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 3, p. 425, doi: 10.2307/30036540.