Accounting for Inequalities

Closes:
Submissions open 31st January 2025

Introduction

In our contemporary world, inequalities remain deeply entrenched across various spheres of life. The economic disparity between the richest and poorest has widened significantly, with a growing concentration of wealth in the hands of a few (Tweedie and Hazelton, 2019). Between 1995 and 2021, as reported by Chancel et al. (2022), the top 1% of population captured 38% of the global increment in wealth, while the bottom 50% claimed just 2%. The gender pay gap persists, with only minimal progress in 2024, marked by a mere 0.3% improvement (World Economic Forum, 2023). Racial and ethnic minorities continue to face systemic discrimination in access to resources, education, and healthcare (Agyemang et al., 2024; Annisette and Prasad, 2017; Munkuli et al., 2024). The climate crisis also exacerbates inequalities (Bigoni and Mohammed, 2023), with those in the Global South disproportionately affected while having limited protection from its devastating impacts (Oxfam International, 2023). 

As a politically embedded discursive practice, accounting has perpetuated inequalities in our world. Historically, accounting, through its calculative neutrality, has supported systems of oppression, including slavery (Jensen et al., 2021), colonisation (Norris et al., 2022), and genocide (Funnell, 1998; Funnell et al., 2022). Under neoliberal regimes, accounting legitimises policies prioritising market efficiency and shareholder value, often at the expense of social justice (Bigoni and Awais, 2024; Nikidehaghani et al., 2021). By obscuring the human costs and demands behind key performance indicators (KPI) or metrics, accounting practices rather contribute to the maintenance of unequal power structures, reinforcing wealth disparities and fostering the exploitation of marginalised groups (Carnegie et al., 2021a; Hammond et al., 2017; Lehman et al., 2018; Nikidehaghani and Cortese, 2023). For instance, accounting rationalises policies related to tax regimes (Sikka, 2015) and welfare programs (Nikidehaghani, 2023; Walker, 2008), often reinforcing systemic inequalities. Further, as automated systems streamline public service delivery, they usually rely on accounting-driven KPIs or metrics prioritising fiscal targets over equity, exacerbating inequalities for marginalised groups (Bracci, 2022; Nikidehaghani et al., 2023).

Yet, just as accounting has contributed to creating these problems, it also holds the potential to become part of the solution, contribute to equitable and sustainable development, and shape a better world (Carnegie et al., 2021b; Carnegie et al., 2024; Pupovac and Nikidehaghani, 2024). This Special Issue of AAAJ seeks to open new discussions and revisit earlier dialogues about the intersection of accounting, accountability and inequality. As the world faces mounting social, environmental, and economic challenges, it is timely to reconsider and reassess the role accounting plays—not just as an apparently neutral calculative practice but as an instrument for both perpetuating inequalities and promoting equity and justice. We invite scholars holding concerns about inequality, or envisaging proposals for reducing inequality, to examine how accounting has been involved in creating and reproducing inequalities and explore how it can embrace new possibilities to address and reduce unfairness and related disparities across societies. The overarching aim of this Special Issue is to foster innovative thinking that pushes the boundaries of accounting research, theory, and practice in addressing some of the most pressing issues of our time.

List of topic areas

We invite papers using various theoretical approaches and methods. Potential topics to explore include, but are not limited to: 

  • Accounting for Inequalities: How accounting practices and discourses have been implicated in maintaining and legitimising systems of inequality across gender, race, and class, as well as economic, social, environmental, and other dimensions. 

  • Accounting for Change: Contributions that propose transformative approaches to accounting practices. How can accounting be reimagined to account for inequalities in a way that challenges the status quo?  

  • Innovative Ways to Account for Inequalities: Studies that propose novel approaches for measuring and representing inequality in different settings. How can accounting more accurately or broadly reflect marginalised groups' lived experiences and inequality's costs? 

  • Innovative Theoretical and Methodological Approaches: Contributions that propose innovative theoretical frameworks or methodological approaches for examining accounting's role in reinforcing inequalities or rather helping to reduce inequalities, as well as resisting regimes of oppression and challenging systems that sustain inequality. 

  • The Role of the Accounting Profession: Studies that explore inequalities within the profession and examine the impact of major consultancy firms and the Big Four professional services firms on regional, national and global disparities. How can accounting professionals be educated and motivated as well as incentivised to integrate social justice and equity into their work, with positive implications for organisational or firm culture? 

  • Empirical Case Studies: Case studies demonstrate how accounting has contributed to or has the potential to address inequalities in various contexts, such as resource allocation, tax regimes, public policy, and corporate practices. 

  • The Impact of Digitisation: Papers exploring how digitisation, particularly in areas like digital tax systems and e-governance, can exacerbate or reduce inequalities. 

  • Historical Research on Accounting and Inequalities: Studies that explore the historical role of accounting in perpetuating or resisting inequalities. How have accounting practices over time contributed to systems of oppression or facilitated social change?

Guest Editors

Dr Mona Nikidehaghani
University of Wollongong, Australia 

Emeritus Professor Garry Carnegie
RMIT University, Australia 

Professor Theresa Hammond
San Francisco State University, USA

Dr.Michele Bigoni
University of Kent, UK

Submissions Information

The last submission date for this Special Issue is 30 November 2025.

Papers are to be submitted during the submission window using the AAAJ ScholarOne submission system at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aaaj. In 'Step 5' of the submission process, select this AAAJ special issue in response to the instruction: "Please select the issue you are submitting to".

Submitted articles must not have been previously published, nor should they be under consideration for publication anywhere else, while under review for this journal. Author guidelines must be strictly followed.

Submit your paper!

Journal homepage

Special Issue Workshop

A workshop will be organised to support authors planning to submit to the Special Issue. It will occur during the APIRA Conference being held in Adelaide, South Australia, during 2- 4 July 2025. Please note that participation in the workshop is not required to submit a manuscript for consideration in the AAAJ Special Issue. Additionally, participation in the workshop does not guarantee acceptance of a submission into the Special Issue. Authors interested in participating must email Dr. Nikidehaghani by 1st March 2025. Further information about the workshop will be dispatched to interested authors.

Contact

If you would like to discuss the AAAJ Special Issue or your potential or possible contribution, please get in touch with Dr Mona Nikidehaghani in the first instance for queries and information at [email protected].

References

Agyemang, G., Dhanani, A., Ejiogu, AR and Perkiss, S. (2024), "Researching race, accounting and accountability: past, present and future", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2024-6976  

Annisette, M. and Prasad, A. (2017), "Critical accounting research in hyper-racial times", Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 43, pp. 5-19, doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2016.06.002. 

Bigoni, M., & Awais, W. (2024). ““I am no longer part of this rat race”: Student resistance to neoliberal accounting education in Pakistan”, Accounting Forum, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2024.2309595

Bigoni, M., & Mohammed, S. (2023). “Critique is unsustainable: a polemic”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 97, 102555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2023.102555 

Bracci, E. (2023). The loopholes of algorithmic public services: an “intelligent” accountability research agenda. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(2), 739-763. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2022-5856 

Carnegie, G., Parker, L. and Tsahuridu, E. (2021a), “It’s 2020: what is accounting today?”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 65-73, (first published, 22 November 2020). 

Carnegie, G., Parker, L. and Tsahuridu, E. (2021b), “Redefining accounting for tomorrow”, Knowledge Gateway, IFAC (published 6 April), available at Redefining Accounting for Tomorrow | IFAC  

Carnegie, G.D., Gomes, D., Parker, L.D., McBride, K. and Tsahuridu, E. (2024), "How accounting can shape a better world: framework, analysis and research agenda", Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 32 No. 5, pp. 1529-1555.   

Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. and Zucman, G. (2022), "World inequality report", World Inequality Lab, Paris. 

Funnell, W. (1998), "Accounting in the service of the Holocaust". Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 9 (4), pp.435-464. 

Funnell, W., Antonelli V., Bigoni, M., Cafaro, E. M., and D’Alessio, R. (2022), “Accounting for Jewish ‘bare life’ in the Fossoli concentration camp, 1943–44”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 88, 102323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102323 

Hammond, T., Cooper, C. & Van Staden, C. J. (2017). "Anglo American Corporation and the South African State". Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30 (6), pp.1399-1423. 

Jensen, M. L., Agyemang, G., & Lehman, C. R. (2021). "Accountabilities, invisibilities and silences in a Danish slave trading company on the Gold Coast in the early 18th century". Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 77, 102181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102181 

Lehman, C. R., Hammond, T. & Agyemang, G. (2018). "Accounting for crime in the US: Race, class and the spectacle of fear". Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 56, 63-75 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.01.002 

Munkuli, B., Nikidehaghani, M., Ma, L., & Chang, M. (2024). "Accounting for racial inequality in South Africa with the black economic empowerment policy". Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2023-6478 

Nikidehaghani, M. (2023). "Accounting and neoliberal responsibilisation: a case study on the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme". Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 37(9), 128-159. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-01-2023-6250 

Nikidehaghani, M., Andrew, J., & Cortese, C. (2023). "Algorithmic accountability: Robodebt and the making of welfare cheats". Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 36(2), 677-711. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2022-5666 

Nikidehaghani, M., & Cortese, C. (2023). When the war is over: Accounting for people with disabilities. Accounting History, 28(2), 262-284. 

Nikidehaghani, M., Cortese, C., & Hui-Truscott, F. (2021). "Accounting and pastoral power in Australian disability welfare reform". Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 80(October). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102098 

Norris, E., Kutubi, S., & Greenland, S. (2022). "Accounting and First Nations: A systematic literature review and directions for future research". Australian Accounting Review, 32(2), 156-180. 

Oxfam International (2023), "Climate equality: a planet for the 99", available at: https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/climate-equality-a-planet-f… (accessed 10 September 2024). 

Pupovac, S., & Nikidehaghani, M. (2024). Sustainable development and First Nations values: a multidimensional accounting approach for mining proposals. Meditari Accountancy Research, 32(5), 1710-1733. 

Sikka, P. (2015), "The hand of accounting and accountancy firms in deepening income and wealth inequalities and the economic crisis: some evidence", Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 30, pp. 46-62. 

Tweedie, D. and Hazelton, J. (2019), "Economic inequality: problems and perspectives for interdisciplinary accounting research", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (7), pp. 1982-2003.  

Walker, S. P. (2008). Accounting, paper shadows and the stigmatised poor. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 453-487. 

World Economic Forum (2023), "Global Gender Gap Report 2023" available at: https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-gender-gap-report-2023/in-full/benchmarking-gender-gaps2023/#:~:text=The%20Global%20Gender%20Gap%20score,compared%20to%20last%20year's%20edition (accessed 15 September 2024).