Having mapped out your article, decided what type it is, how you should present your research, etc., you are ready to write. Here are some tips which should help you present your article in an attractive manner to your peer group, or your practitioner colleagues.
Use both to capture the attention of the reader. The title of the article should immediately catch the eye, as with the following examples:
All the above titles are catchy, using alliteration, descriptive phrases, repetition and above all terms which link into business preoccupations.
Use a journalistic style to draw the reader in to the subject, making clear its practical relevance, as in the following examples:
The first example states the problem directly; the second starts with an arresting statement followed by some examples; the third has a list of questions.
Link the article to the real world wherever possible, using relevant examples preferably with high profile companies.
We quoted above from "Brand globally, market locally"; the article deals with the highly important business concept of branding. It illustrates the issue of market segmentation, with references to the authors' own clients (which are not named) including a boxed case study which appears in its own page and which uses diagrams. The whole thing stands out, giving the article a visual appeal and enabling the reader to focus in on the case.
Word lengths for practitioner journals tend on the whole to be shorter than for academic journals; practitioners are busy people, whose professional reading time must be carefully focused. Note carefully the word limit and DO NOT REGARD IT AS THE TARGET. Brevity and conciseness will be much appreciated by your readers.
Don't have a long preamble: get to the point of your article early on!
Write in a lively concise style, as if you were writing for a magazine rather than an academic journal:
Price-performance competition makes purely performance-based differentiation difficult and unstable. At the same time, unbundling creates confusion and complexity for the consumer by expanding choices at every layer. As a result, branding, service, and customer relationships will become vital to sustaining success.
Product availability, for example, could be an element of differentiation – a commodity product might stand out from the competition by being easy to purchase and never being out of stock. For component suppliers, this means never letting a consignment warehouse at the original equipment manufacturer's plant run dry.
Winners will also have well-executed service and technical support. Products might be comparable, especially in terms of price and performance, so after-sales service can make or break relationships. And relationships will still be the basis for repeat sales.
Comparable products may also differ on their compatibility with adjacent products, so companies can stand out by making customization and compatibility non-issues. A final way to differentiate otherwise equal products is through partner network support. Two servers may have similar features, but one might come with a larger network of software and reseller partners.
(Vivek Kapur et al., "High-tech 2005: the horizontal, hypercompetitive future", Strategy & Leadership, Vol. 31 No. 2)
(Eleanor R. O'Higgins, "Global business means global responsibilities", Corporate Governance, Vol. 3 No. 3)
We began a culture change programme in our unit. We started our own programmes to develop trainers into consultants. We initiated learning contracts and learning sets. We ran seminars and workshops in which we talked through the changes and how we felt about what was happening. We decided how to accelerate our own progress. In most of the learning sets we chose to facilitate ourselves thereby increasing our experience and skill in that challenging role. We learned the difference between consulting and facilitating. We nurtured our HR contacts but also began to develop stronger links with business managers.
(Ian Clark,"Transforming training in an information technology company", Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 17 No. 1)
The evolution of Finnish global companies may be condensed into three phases. The first one took place at the beginning of industrialization back in the 18th and 19th centuries and continued until the 1960s when the foundations of the northern European welfare state began to be laid. In Finland, from the 1960s onwards, company welfare activities were gradually organized at the level of the state and municipalities. However, companies still have a significant role in providing employee health services and other benefits as a part of their human resource policy and responsibility as employers. Nevertheless, the welfare society has basically changed the status of companies, which now have an obligation to participate in the maintenance of society, not by providing benefits directly but mainly by paying taxes.
(Elisa Juholin, "For business or the good of all", Corporate Governance, Vol. 4 No. 3)
Some journals, such as Journal of Business Strategy, encourage the use of these, and they can certainly liven up an article, as in "Brand globally, market locally" quoted above, or in "Beyond BSC: a process based approach to performance management". Make sure that the figure really does elucidate a point better than plain words could have. Also make sure that you follow the author guidelines for submission of figures, which should always be good quality and submitted in both electronic and hard copy form.
Practitioner articles should NOT include long literature reviews (descriptions of the literature on the subject). If included, do so as part of the background: see the example of the literature review in the article "Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice", where the author devotes a page to the literature by way of explaining key background concepts such as communities of practice and what makes them tick.
The different approach to a literature review in a practitioner and academic article can be seen in the following two case studies:
Note that the style of referring to other works is by surname and date – Lave and Wenger (1991) – this is known as the Harvard referencing system and it is explained in our "How to... use the Harvard reference system" guide. However, try to keep references to the minimum.